Categories
Media release

Absa PMI Rises Sharply In April Off Low Base

Absa PMI Rises Sharply In April Off Low Base

scroll for more

After plunging to an all-time low of a mere 5.1 index points in April, the business activity index of the Absa PMI survey rose sharply to 43.2 index points in May. “The increase was driven by most factories returning to production, albeit at reduced capacity, during May, after the Level 5 nationwide lockdown brought manufacturing output to a near standstill in April,” said Miyelani Maluleke. Economist at Absa Corporate and Investment Banking.

Many respondents reported that production was still well below normal capacity in May but, nevertheless, higher than that (in some case zero production) recorded in the previous month. “The sharp rise in the business activity index in May is relative to virtually nothing in April and still suggests very subdued overall activity levels,” explained Maluleke. Worryingly, some respondents indicated that whereas the lockdown regulations in May would have allowed for a further ramp-up of production, there was not sufficient demand to warrant this. Indeed, the new sales orders index did not rebound to the same extent as the output index. Furthermore, the employment index remained stuck at an all-time low, rising by a marginal 0.2 points to 26.8 in May. 

The sharp month-on-month movement in the output index in May should be visible in the official manufacturing production data as well. April is likely to see an unprecedented drop, with a solid month-on-month rebound expected in May. Assuming Level 3 (or lower) is maintained for the entire country during the full month, output should recover further during June. Indeed, the PMI’s expected business conditions index rebounded in May from an all-time low reached in April, rising to the best level since mid-2019. However, this does not mean that the level of factory output will return to where it was before the lockdown. It will likely take some time before the supply-chain disruptions are filtered out of the system and for global as well as local demand to return to normal. The risk that load shedding could reappear as the economy gets going could further hamper the recovery. It is also important to note that the South African economy was already struggling before the COVID-19 pandemic reached our shores. In early 2020, the business activity and new sales orders indices of the Absa PMI already fell to levels last seen during the recovery of the 2008/09 recession.

The increase in the output and new sales orders indices supported an increase in the headline manufacturing PMI which rose to 50.2 index points in May. However, as stressed last month, in these unique circumstances, it is better to look at the subcomponents than the headline PMI. This is not only the case in South Africa, but also globally where the supplier deliveries index inadvertently lifts the headline PMI. This subcomponent is inverted which means that when goods are less readily available than before and delivery performance worsens, this actually lifts the index. This is because in normal times, an order that takes longer to be delivered is indicative of increased demand by the manufacturing sector for inputs in the production process. “Last month, and to a lesser extent in May, COVID-19-related production stoppages disrupted the supply chain to such an extent that deliveries were slower even without increased demand,” said Maluleke.

Absa Group has joined forces with Universities South Africa (USAf) and contributed R5 million to provide appropriate learning devices and mobile data to university students to assist with their online or remote learning.

This contribution will benefit students from six, mostly historically disadvantaged universities, across five provinces. The benefitting universities are: the Vaal University of Technology (200 devices); the University of KwaZulu-Natal (200 devices); the University of the Western Cape (200 devices); the University of Limpopo (100 devices); the University of Venda (100 devices) as well as the University of the Free State (200 devices). The receiving institutions, which by now have identified the deserving students and the extent of need, will devise their own distribution strategies.

The outbreak of COVID-19 has brought life around the world to a near standstill, with nationwide closures currently in force in 150 countries.  In a matter of weeks, the pandemic has changed education, forcing millions of learners into home-schooling and online learning. Recent data released by UNESCO Institute for Statistics shows that 68% of the world’s enrolled student population is presently staying away from schools and universities.

In South Africa, schools, vocational training colleges and universities have similarly been forced to either suspend academic activity or resort to emergency teaching via online platforms. The scale and speed of the closures represent an unprecedented challenge for the education sector, and the full impact is yet to be fully understood.

Given that the Ministry of Education, Science and Innovation has undertaken to meet the laptop needs of the NSFAS-funded students across institutions, Absa’s contribution will be channelled to assist students in the missing-middle category.

“Absa’s contribution undoubtedly eliminates a major challenge for at least 1000 vulnerable students at our universities,” Professor Ahmed Bawa, USAf’s Chief Executive Officer says. “If we are to succeed in our resolve to enable every single student to complete the 2020 academic year, then providing them with these devices and data is inevitable.” 

“We have a well-established commitment to provide access to higher learning across the continent. Remote learning is now a necessity, and there are many students who do not have the means to access their education in this way. We decided to provide this additional support to students who otherwise would be severely disadvantaged during this academic year and in the future,” says Daniel Mminele, Absa Group Chief Executive.

Absa’s contribution is a response to USAf’s ongoing fundraising to assist students in distress with tuition fees, on the one hand, and with appropriate devices to help them navigate the remote teaching/ learning terrain, on the other. Additional fundraising is seeking to support much-needed capacity building in academics.

https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse
Categories
Covid 19

The impact of COVID-19 on the SA private healthcare sector

The impact of COVID-19 on the SA private healthcare sector

scroll for more

Liza Eustace, Sector Head: Healthcare, Construction & Hospitality

The impact of Covid-19 has been far reaching and naturally, some industries have been harder hit than others. The extent and length of which is still uncertain as the country balances flattening the curve versus a material long-term economic fallout.

Even though the healthcare sector is normally seen as a generally defensive sector - and on the surface should benefit from a health crisis, it is also feeling a significant impact from the remedial measures taken which have removed the majority of revenue outside of Covid-19 treatment.

Since the middle of March, when elective surgeries were cancelled, the hospital groups have been experiencing reduced occupancies to as low as 40% from highs of c. 65-70%. The expectation is that occupancies will continue to fall and many hospitals may actually need to be temporarily closed if elective surgeries continue to be restricted.

Surgical cases account for between 50-60% of private hospital revenue, and generate a higher margin. The loss of electives for the duration of COVID-19 should translate into demand deferred, as opposed to lost, however in the short term, this puts pressure on income, and in the absence of being able to meaningfully cut staff, given the dire need of nurses for the pandemic, this leaves private hospitals exposed to pressure on liquidity and covenant levels.

There have however been calls from various medical societies to motivate the lifting of the restrictions on some elective surgeries that could lead to possible fatalities should they continue to be postponed. Whilst it is believed that under strict hygiene protocol there may be some progress in this regard, it is still uncertain the exact stance the government will take post the lockdown moving to Level 4 from the highest Level 5 from 1 May. The worse-case scenario predicts the peak of COVID to come in September, and that is a lengthy period for certain patients that require necessary but elective surgeries.

The increasing pressure for surgeries to commence relates primarily to Medically Necessary Time Sensitive (“MeNTS”) procedures. This includes treatment of malignancies and other potentially life or limb threatening medical conditions, alleviation of pain, improvement of function and quality of life and prevention of serious complications of disease progression associated with surgically treated conditions.

Elective also refers to the fact that surgeon and patient can elect the timing and scheduling of a surgery without a negative impact on outcome of the disease progress, yet such surgery is still essential. In the meantime, with the restriction on electives, private hospitals are relatively empty; and Covid-19 patient numbers vary from 10-150 people in total in some hospitals.

Related to this, private hospitals have submitted pricing proposals to the government for treatment of Covid-19 public patients, but there has been little clarity on the process and reimbursement scales. The geographic distribution of private hospitals is also likely to drive the volume of Covid-19 occupancies, which will influence how management reorganise their services in each of those facilities. Overall, it is expected that the admission of public patients into the private hospitals will be a net positive for the hospital groups, although they are not expecting to recoup more than the basic cost of stay. It is estimated that the all in cost of a 20-day stay for a Covid-19 patient would be between R100 000 and R300 000, depending on the allocation to a general ward, ICU or high care ward.

A continuing concern is the shortage of Personal Protection Equipment (“PPE”) and ventilators, which are mostly imported from China and some from Europe. Whilst companies are currently increasing spend on PPE predominantly from offshore, the government is taking steps to support and encourage local manufacture. Currently, the public sector has about 1 000 ventilators and the private sector double that.

Expectations are that a total of 7 000 ventilators will be required. The balance of about 2 300 for the public and 4 700 for the private sector therefore need to be sourced. Whilst the hospital groups are taking measures to prepare themselves, there will be a need to balance long term demand and avoid over capacity post the pandemic with the cost of a ventilator in the region of up to R300 000, depending on the type and specifications. In addition, given the recent debate on the efficacy of ventilators, companies will be mindful of over investing at this point.

There will be opportunities for consolidation post Covid-19 as smaller players in the private healthcare sector may not be able to withstand the continued suppressed revenue and consequent liquidity pressures. There is also an expectation of a significant demand spike post lockdown on account of the delayed nature of the procedures. Some private hospitals groups are already exploring how to build this into their schedules through possible weekend and night surgeries. However, on the whole, aside from the pressures that increased funder case management and restricted hospital networks will provide, the new normal for the private hospital groups will be about right sizing their businesses to a smaller and slower growth sector. The Private Medical Insurance (“PMI”) trajectory and its sustainability will be crucial in driving the private healthcare sector’s growth. In addition, the viability of the medical aid providers is critical as they remain the largest outstanding to these smaller companies.

The pharmaceutical companies have been less impacted. Whilst experiencing a change in demand in various product streams, they have not yet seen significant interruptions to supply chains, despite several logistical hurdles such as border closures, regional lockdowns and flight restrictions. Logistics channels within and out of Europe and the East are presently slower than normal causing delays in incoming raw materials and finished goods. Production sites and third-party manufacturers of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (“API’s”) however have not been affected and are in full production.

There are however some restrictions to a range of API’s required from India, particularly paracetamol, which is an important API for certain products in South Africa. China and India are the main suppliers of API’s since local production is just too expensive with less than 20% of API’s manufactured locally. In general pharmaceutical companies have several months of supply of API products, but sustained restrictions by India could be challenging.

On the demand side, there has been an elevated need out of Europe for a number of locally produced anaesthetic products used for sedation and muscle relaxation, both of which are important in the treatment of Covid-19 patients. Demand has also increased significantly for certain products related to the treatment of Covid-19 symptoms such as pain, cold and flu and respiratory products. Pharma companies are also acutely aware that whilst China has started to normalise, there is still a risk of a “second wave” of infections that could result in increased demand for medicines relating to Covid-19.

COVID is unprecedented and whilst everyone examines the data, no one has a clear forecast view. Delays in elective surgeries will impact short term demand for related products, but companies need to balance demand for operating theatre requirements related to COVID-19. In South Africa the rate of infection continues marginally upward but the real trend will only be seen as the country enters this next phase of a gradual lock down release which is exacerbated by the winter season. At least 19% of our population is infected by influenza annually during the winter season, and hospital groups are operating in real time leading up to this possible forecasted peak of infections in the coming months.

Categories
Covid 19

Six steps to a seamless cloud security journey

Six steps to a seamless cloud security journey

scroll for more

By Sandro Bucchianeri; Absa Group Chief Security Officer

With where we find ourselves today in relation to COVID-19, the urgency to move to the cloud has never been greater.

An organisation’s cloud journey can be a beautiful symphony or sound like a five-year-old banging the kitchen pots and pans. Given the current COVID-19 circumstances and the requirement for social distancing, many employees are probably working from home, needing safe and easy access to applications and documents in the cloud. Here are some tips to make the cloud journey the trip of a lifetime.

Gradually let go of legacy infrastructure

Moving to the cloud is a turning point that can be used to enforce new standards that are difficult to apply to current legacy environments. Start with the basics,: all builds must be defined through an infrastructure code software tool. Sharing standard, approved patterns for common components with teams will speed up their assimilation of the technology. A change control programme (where both existing and new systems are constantly monitored) is essential to ensuring the migration to cloud is implemented systematically and effectively, minimising possible business disruption.

Check the fine print

Licence management is different when using the cloud, so vendors must ensure clients understand it and disclose the T&Cs. There may also be some hidden benefits, as a number of cloud providers offer discounts when clients move over to them. If there is a free trial period, use it. Also check if any technical consultancy is available at no cost.

Let cloud balance the load

Gone are the days of hardware appliances providing load-balancing across servers and data centres. Cloud providers should offer this as an easy-to-use service.

Ultimately, if the cloud environment is treated like an additional data centre, the business can take advantage of its many benefits.

By combining this load, and balancing capability with distributed denial-of-service protection and a Web application firewall, companies can host a well-defined, resilient and secure front-end for all Internet-facing applications.

Take security seriously

With the size of the cloud and the ease of accidently sharing data with the world, this should be a top priority. Companies don’t, or shouldn’t, allow on-premises application developers to change firewall rules to expose their applications, so they shouldn’t allow them to do it in the cloud.

In fact, when centralising cloud ingress (traffic that enters the network) and egress (traffic that exits the network) there is an opportunity for enhanced oversight and control.

Ensure scalability

Simply put, automation is needed to apply security at scale. If all applications are built using infrastructure as code and can automatically scale as load changes, the ability to quickly roll out patches can be straightforward.

This is achieved through enforcing a minimum skill level for teams moving to the cloud, as well as strict architecture requirements to support scalability and automated builds. All the code must be stored in a central versioning repository, similar to the source code.

This enables easy change management and review, as well as helps engineers think about how they could build pipelines to automate testing, deployments as well as the “dreaded” destructive (DR) tests (in order to monitor ongoing functionality and regression).

Take advantage of the cloud provider’s service offering

As firms are more likely to move from on-premises to cloud-based infrastructure, so too are engineering teams moving from on-premises to cloud-based skills.  Whether the on-premises environment is built from CD, or automated from bare metal, companies can benefit from the tools and processes available from the cloud provider.

However, if the team is not prepared for this, they will continue to run just as they always have, and often not even realise the assistance the cloud provider can provide.  In addition, engage with the cloud provider to determine what training it can make available, and pick a minimum level that all engineers should meet before they can move their applications through to the cloud.

Ultimately, if the cloud environment is treated like an additional data centre, the business can take advantage of its many benefits: great scalability in compute power, the ability to manage large estates, seamless remote working for employees and access to additional metadata that can help drive actionable insights.

First published on ITWeb

Categories
Covid 19

A new world of work

A new world of work

scroll for more

By Dr Roze Phillips, futurist, medical doctor and Absa’s Group Executive for People and Culture

COVID-19 is casting a long shadow. We are medically, economically and morally vulnerable.

This shadow will not be shortening or lifting in the near future.

Already scenarios of U and V-shaped economic recoveries are being replaced by talk of a W-shaped one – an initial recovery followed rapidly by another economic downturn and then later, a second recovery.  

The reality is that we will need to find ways to co-exist with the coronavirus for much longer than we expected. And we must accept that social distancing will be with us for a while. It has become the new normal. Life will never be the same again.

There’s another certainty too - the future of work is being rewritten. Work, for most of us, is central to our existence. It is the scaffolding that allows us to be economically active, support the needs of ourselves and our families and feel recognised and valued.

But economic growth, as French economist Thomas Piketty points out, “is not a tide that lifts all boats”. There are winners and losers. The International Labour Organization (ILO) expects the crisis to wipe out 6.7 per cent of working hours globally in the second quarter of 2020 – equivalent to 195 million full-time workers. This far exceeds the effects of the 2008-9 financial crisis.  

As this happens, workplaces are being reconfigured. Various industries have overhauled their spacing policies to observe social distancing protocols. The trend of less space per person has reversed into more space per person, allowing fewer people per building.

So, business models must adapt. Companies that over the years replaced their command-and- control operating models with flatter structures and lesser bureaucracy will benefit from their adaptability.

But, it’s not just organisational constructs: leadership too, needs an overhaul.

Performance scorecards, with a long-term focus mainly on financial metrics, are no longer worth the paper they are written on. Instead, a new leadership compact is needed, based on the acknowledgement that solutions aren’t immediately obvious, but that we are all in it together. Handled well, the long-accepted corporate trust deficit might convert into a surplus.

The way executives have sacrificed part of their salaries during this crisis, bodes well for this. It’s equally encouraging that some companies are still paying staff and not retrenching or cutting salaries.

Companies are responding with a combination of conservatism and boldness, supporting governments and communities in protecting jobs on the one hand, while on the other introducing flexible labour models that include permanent and temporary workers, freelancers and robots.

The responses vary. Many companies may opt for a reduction in workdays. Others will rethink their ratio of permanent employees to gig workers. Expect to see leaders pivoting towards business models that create new digital and online forms of value. Until now, the concept of unlocking the digital dividend has largely been elusive: COVID-19 may change that.

From now on, remote working will be the default position. The lack of office space will necessitate it, social distancing will demand it and investments in advanced digital technologies, infrastructure and collaboration tools will facilitate it.

COVID-19, of course, is not the first attack on our jobs. The fourth industrial has already changed the job landscape. As it is, humans and machines are increasingly working together, bolstering efficiency and productivity. The workforce is increasingly structured by project rather than job function, allowing tasks to be created and dismantled flexibly.  

Technology has decoupled work from finite hours and locations. This means people can work part time, and even rejoin the workforce after retirement. And it means an oversupply of talent in South Africa can easily be harnessed elsewhere.

But we must be wary too, and guard against depending on the government’s support measures over empowering workers and stimulating entrepreneurial drive. And not everyone is a knowledge worker.

The late acclaimed academic CK Prahalad said we must “stop thinking of the poor as victims or as a burden and start recognising them as resilient and creative entrepreneurs and value conscious consumers”.

Once this truly happens, a whole new world of opportunity will open up.

But the new model of national co-operation requires a shift in paradigm from either doing well or doing good, to doing well by doing good.

This simple idea has created new opportunities. Many people have the misconception that “doing good” means a trade-off between financial return and impact. Not so. It is, in fact, the only business model that will survive the pandemic.

Rebuilding economies requires one key ingredient - talent. As the war for talent invariably takes centre stage again, the best talent will choose to rebuild where bridges were built, not where bridges were burnt. And leaders who built trust during the crisis, will reap the benefits.

Amid a new caring culture, the spirit of Ubuntu has infiltrated our consciousness. Calls to “protect the frontline, not the bottom line” abound. Maybe now, with the moral imperative and prevailing psyche of protecting vulnerable people, irrespective of economic utility, we have a fighting chance.

Categories
Media release

OMFIF Report Shows African Markets Face Extreme Test Of Resilience Due To COVID-19

OMFIF Report Shows African Markets Face Extreme Test Of Resilience Due To COVID-19

scroll for more

Highlights:

  • Average overall score dips to 51 out of 100 from 53 in 2019, partly due to slower market activity in the first half of 2020 and stricter scoring in some indicators.
  • Countries perform best in ‘market transparency, tax and regulatory environment’, scoring 67 on average.
  • South Africa and Mauritius maintain their lead in the index, scoring 89 and 79, respectively.
  • Namibia tops ‘capacity of local investors’, while Mauritius retains its lead in ‘legality and enforceability of standard financial markets master agreements’.
  • Green finance is gaining momentum, with Nigeria, Kenya and Egypt among countries that have issued sovereign green bonds in the past year.

COVID-19 has made the underlying structure and resilience of African financial markets a more important matter for domestic and international investors, as the continent grapples with returning to sustainable growth, the Absa Africa Financial Markets Index shows. Now in its fourth year, the index, which is produced by OMFIF, has become a benchmark for the investment community to gauge countries’ performance across a range of indicators important for financial market development.

The index has expanded to 23 countries, up from 17 in the inaugural publication. The latest additions, Eswatini, Lesotho and Malawi, reflect mounting interest in the region’s potential as a source of growth and opportunity.

‘As an organisation with deep Pan-African ties we are passionate about our contribution to the development of strong financial markets on the continent, the value of which has been highlighted by the challenges we are currently facing,’ said Daniel Mminele, group chief executive of Absa Group.

‘The AFMI report is a tool that helps to anchor policy discussions between regulators, exchanges, investors and corporates on how to promote open, accessible and transparent markets, which are necessary to mobilise capital and promote investment on the continent,’ Mminele added.

Key findings:

South Africa again tops the index by a wide margin, thanks to its deep capital and foreign exchange markets. Mauritius secures the runner-up position for the second year in a row, partly because of its alignment with internationally recognised legal frameworks. Nigeria, Botswana and Namibia round off the top five. Nigeria has relatively liquid markets, while Namibia and Botswana enjoy a high concentration of domestic assets from pension funds.

On average, countries’ scores in ‘market depth’ dropped by 0.6 from last year. The withdrawal of international capital impacted the region’s stock markets as liquidity dropped in the first half of the year, hampering countries’ performance in this pillar. This decline demonstrates the importance of deepening financial markets and encouraging local participation. 

Countries’ scores in ‘legality and enforceability of standard financial markets master agreements’ deteriorated by an average of 8.1, reflecting a change in the basis for assessment introduced in this year’s edition.

Scoring for the enforcement on close-out netting rules is based on data and legal opinions from the International Securities and Derivatives Association, leading to significant changes in the marks of some countries, including Kenya, Tanzania, Namibia, Angola and Botswana.

Although the pandemic disrupted markets, it has presented opportunities for capital market development. The African Development Bank issued coronabonds in March to help finance COVID-19 response measures.

Other sustainability initiatives are gaining momentum, especially in green finance. Nigeria, Kenya and Egypt are among countries that have issued sovereign green bonds in the past year. Rwanda is establishing a green investment bank, while Uganda plans to develop a fund for post-disaster environmental restoration.

‘Worldwide, investors are urging African countries to step up efforts to improve their financial market structures as a crucial means of returning to sustainable growth. The index tracks these developments and provides clear benchmarks for progress,’ said David Marsh, chairman of OMFIF. ‘African counties can help each other by learning best practice from each other – and then implementing it.’
​​​​
Download the report here.

Categories
Media release

Absa PMI Business Activity Indicator Crashes To All-Time Low

Absa PMI Business Activity Indicator Crashes To All-Time Low

scroll for more

The business activity index of the Absa PMI survey crashed to an all-time low of a mere 5.1 index points in April. The decline means that manufacturing output came to a near standstill during the nationwide lockdown, with almost all respondents reporting a decline in activity compared to the previous month. Indeed, many respondents indicated that zero production took place during the lockdown.

While some essential goods production continued during April, this was concentrated in specific subsectors. The current reading is about 25 points below the lowest level recorded during the global financial crisis, which suggests that the decline in actual manufacturing output will be well in excess of the drop recorded at the time (a 23% annual fall in April 2009). With no to little activity in the local economy, overall demand for manufactured goods also plummeted. The new sales orders index plunged to 8.9 index points in April and, like business activity, reached a record low by some margin (series since September 1999). Export sales also fell sharply in April. The employment index tracked activity lower but did not decline by the same margin as the business activity and new sales orders indices. About half of the respondents reported a decline in their staff complement. Formal-sector employment tends to lag activity trends, which means that further job losses are likely going forward.

After already slowing in March, supplier performance deteriorated further in April. In normal times, slower lead times point to increased activity and add positively to the headline PMI. However, COVID-19 related production stoppages have disrupted the global and local supply chains to such an extent that delivery times slowed sharply even without increased demand. Due to the inadvertent positive boost from supplier deliveries, the headline PMI only fell to 46.1 index points in April. This is despite unprecedented declines in the other four subcomponents and means that the headline reading does not provide a fair reflection of conditions on the factory floor in April. Most global manufacturing PMIs are affected, and in fact lifted, by this unique occurrence and the focus should thus rather be on the subcomponents of the PMI.

“The PMI survey shows the immediate, devastating impact the lockdown had on manufacturing output and overall demand. While some easing of restrictions from May should aid a slow recovery in coming months, a lot of manufacturing capacity will remain idle for some time,” said Miyelani Maluleke, Economist at Absa Corporate and Investment Banking. As a result, the index tracking expected business conditions in six months’ time ticked down further from a record-low already recorded in March.

Categories
Media release

Absa Group Publishes Sustainability Policy And Standard On Coal Financing

Absa Group Publishes Sustainability Policy And Standard On Coal Financing

scroll for more

Absa Group Publishes Sustainability Policy and Standard on Coal Financing

Absa has published its updated sustainability policy and standard for financing coal, affirming the group’s commitment as a responsible financier to address the negative impacts of climate change.

The updated policy and standard apply the Principles for Responsible Banking (PRB), which is the framework that establishes the role of the banking industry globally in helping to meet the objectives of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement. Absa became a founding signatory to the PRB in September 2019.

“As a leading African bank, we recognise the impact of climate change and believe that we can play a shaping role in enabling sustainable economic and social development for the societies in which we operate.  Through this policy and standard, and by working together with our clients and customers, we will continue to integrate sustainability into our strategy and operations to drive positive change,” says Daniel Mminele, Absa’s Group Chief Executive

The accumulation in the atmosphere of greenhouse gases, especially those resulting from burning of fossil fuels such as coal, has been found to be the predominant cause of global warming and climate change. As a result, Absa will not fund new coal-fired electricity generation unless under extenuating circumstances that will be governed under strict guidelines. 

Effective immediately, projects requesting this type of funding will be evaluated using the following enhanced due diligence criteria:

  • The Equator Principles;
  • The OECD export credit eligibility criteria based on country, technology and plant size;
  • Country commitments in their national development plans and nationally determined contributions to the Paris Climate Agreements;
  • The World Bank Environmental, Health and Safety guidelines;
  • A climate-related transition risk review to consider the project’s impact on water quality and availability, and air pollution; and
  •  Independent advisors will assess feasible and cost-effective options to reduce project-related greenhouse gas emissions.

Absa encourages renewable energy technology such as wind and hydropower as a viable means to meet Africa’s power needs.

“We are already a leading player in financing the continent’s renewable energy, and we plan to intensify our focus on funding renewable energy projects that are environmentally, socially and economically feasible,” says Mminele.

Financing of new coal-fired industrial boilers or furnaces and projects using metallurgical coal will also be subject to enhanced due diligence.

Absa will continue to finance existing coal sector clients while supporting them to transition to more sustainable business models. Greenfield coal mining projects will not be financed unless they meet Absa’s enhanced due diligence criteria.

Absa will add standards for financing other climate-sensitive sectors in due course.

Categories
Media release

Absa Looks To Promote Intra-Regional Trade And Investment Through A US$ 250 Million Trade Finance Deal

Absa Looks To Promote Intra-Regional Trade And Investment Through A US$ 250 Million Trade Finance Deal

scroll for more

Absa and the African Development Bank Group (AfDB) have signed a US$ 250-million Risk Participation Agreement (RPA) which, when fully utilised, is estimated to mobilise over US$ 2 billion worth of trade business over three years.

The RPA was signed on the side-lines of the 2019 African Investment Forum (AIF) held in Johannesburg.

This facility, through a 50:50 risk sharing approach, will help to promote broad-based economic growth on the African continent through increased facilitation of import-export activities of African corporates and small and medium-sized enterprises, and increase intra-Africa trade and regional financial integration in line with the AfDB’s High 5 strategic priorities.

The RPA enables Absa and AfDB to equally share the risk of issuing trade finance facilities to African banks who have been unable to access trade finance support, due to a number of multinational banks exiting the continent through de-risking.

“Intra-Africa Trade is crucial to harness the potential of Africa, which boasts 60% of the world’s arable land and an abundance of resources. AfDB and Absa are Financial institutions which are intimately involved in the provision of financial services to support these flows.” says Temi Ofong, Deputy CEO of Absa Regional Operations and Chief Operating Officer, Absa Corporate and Investment Banking.

Carmel Kistasamy, Head, Global Development Organisations at Absa Corporate and Investment Banking says the agreement will benefit many African banks and their clients who have been unable to access trade finance after the 2008 financial crisis. Kistasamy sees demand for trade finance coming particularly from sectors such as agriculture and manufacturing.

She says the investment spending gap for Africa’s development continues to widen with latest estimates of between US$ 130 – US$ 170bn per annum. Small and medium-enterprises, which are seen as drivers for economic growth and job creation, require significant funding to expand their businesses and the private sector has a key role to play in cross border investment.

George Wilson, Head of Institutional Trade Finance at Absa Corporate and Investment Banking says AfDB has played a crucial role in assisting with reducing Africa’s trade finance gap.

“Not only does their involvement directly address their developmental mandate, it greatly expands the reach and capacity of Absa’s continental Trade Hub and has the potential to practically broaden the access to trade finance and developmental growth in Africa. We see this as a key stepping stone for even more impactful trade finance collaboration with the AfDB into Africa.” says Wilson.

“This deal is the result of what happens when you have the bravery to imagine and the will to get things done and we look forward to working with the AfDB to bring our clients’ possibilities to life.” says Ofong.

Categories
Media release

Absa Executive Directors And Prescribed Officers Forego 33% Of Pay For Three Months

Absa executive directors and prescribed officers forego 33% of pay for three months

scroll for more

The rapid spread of COVID-19 infections across the world is the most serious public health challenge the world has faced in decades. While social distancing and movement control measures imposed by governments are proving to be an effective tool to contain the spread of infections, it is the burden on public health systems and the materially negative impact on ordinary people that make this a potential human tragedy.

Following the commendable example set by several African heads of state and political leaders in Absa’s presence markets, who have decided to make monthly donations from their salaries to public efforts to combat the virus, the executive directors and prescribed officers of the Absa Group have decided to make similar contributions in their individual capacities.

These are the Group Chief Executive, Daniel Mminele, the Deputy Group Chief Executive, Peter Matlare, the Finance Director, Jason Quinn, the Chief Executive of Retail & Business Banking SA, Arrie Rautenbach, and the Chief Executive of Corporate and Investment Banking, Charles Russon.

These executives will forego 33% of their monthly salaries for the next three months and donate these amounts to both the Solidarity Fund as well as the Group’s COVID-19 community support programmes. Colleagues at all levels of the organisation will be encouraged to consider making donations in line with their own personal circumstances.

“Having made an initial contribution of R10m to the Solidarity Fund, and to other programmes across several countries in which we operate, and delivered comprehensive customer relief programmes, the Absa Group is also in the process of expanding our efforts to make further contributions in all the markets in which we have a presence. The scale of the challenge requires that we work together to find solutions that can help us fight this massive threat to public health and our economic prospects,” said Daniel Mminele, Group Chief Executive of Absa Group.